Raw+ Commission: The Only Cost Line in Your Statement · India
The FxPro Raw+ account: raw spreads from 0.0 pips plus a commission, built for active traders and scalpers.
Open FxPro Account →Raw+ is the account model that writes its own cost down for you. According to FxPro it shows spreads from 0.0 pips on major pairs and charges a commission of $3.50 per lot per side instead of building the cost into a wider spread — and because that commission is a separate charge, it is the one cost a finished trade carries in plain sight. Read a period back and the commission column states exactly what the model cost, with nothing to reconstruct. A Standard account writes nothing down: with no commission, its cost is the wider all-in spread sitting inside every fill price. This pricing suits frequent traders and scalpers, where small per-trade spread savings add up; Raw+ runs on MetaTrader 4 and a similar raw-pricing model is available on cTrader. Which of the two suits you is a question your own closed volume answers better than any comparison table.
What Raw+ actually delivers (measured)
What the Raw+ account actually delivered when we measured it on FxPro’s own MT5 feed:
- EUR/USD measured at a 0.2-pip median spread and about $9.00 all-in per standard lot.
- That breaks even in 0.9 pips, and the spread measured perfectly stable (stability ratio 1) — tight and steady enough to scalp.
- Across the majors the measured spread sat at or below an independent interbank reference feed (EUR/USD +0.18, AUD/USD +0.04, USD/CAD −0.4 pips).
- Market orders in our test filled in about 78 to 99 milliseconds with near-zero slippage and no rejects.
- Raw+ commission is tiered by order size, with a minimum on the smallest size:
| Order size | Commission (Raw+) |
|---|---|
| 0.01 lot | $4.00 per side |
| 0.1 lot | $3.50 per side |
| 1.0 lot | $3.50 per side |
First-hand from the live feed; confirm the current figures in your FxPro platform.
FxPro Raw+ at a glance
- Raw spreads from 0.0 pips on major pairs
- Commission of $3.50 per lot per side
- Built for frequent traders and scalpers
- Runs on MetaTrader 4 (cTrader offers a similar raw model)
- Contrasts with the Standard all-in-spread account
The one cost line the account writes down
Two account models, two kinds of paperwork. On Standard the cost of a trade is finished business the instant the fill happens — it went into the price, and no line in the report will ever name it. On Raw+ the same money is split, and its commission half is written down against every deal at $3.50 per lot per side.
That is worth more after the fact than it looks before it. An itemised charge can be summed, divided, sorted by instrument and compared between periods. An embedded one has to be modelled from volume every single time, and the model is only as good as the spread figure you feed it.
It also makes the tiering visible. The measured commission table above shows $4.00 per side at 0.01 lot against $3.50 at 0.1 and 1.0 lot, so a report full of very small deals will not divide down to a clean $7.00 round turn. The column is telling the truth there; the assumption was the rounded thing.
Totalling the commission column
The total itself is a one-line job — add the commission of every deal closed inside the date range. What matters is what you divide it by.
Divide by lots traded and you get commission per lot, which should sit near $7.00 round turn. Divide by the number of deals and you get commission per trade, which says something else entirely: it rises when trade size rises, and it is the figure that makes a large period look like an expensive one. Keep both, because they disagree in a useful way.
The other pass worth making is to sort the column by instrument. The commission rate does not vary by instrument but your volume does, so what comes out is a ranking of where the money actually went — rarely the ranking you would have guessed from the profit column.
The half the column does not cover
Commission is half of a Raw+ cost, not all of it. Spreads from 0.0 pips are a floor rather than a description, and the measured feed prices the spread half per lot for every instrument on it — which is exactly why the all-in figure lands above the $7.00 round turn the column adds up to.
So a report understates a Raw+ period by the spread portion, every time, by construction. Price it the way you would on any account — lots traded multiplied by the measured spread cost per lot — and add it on. The measured feed carries the per-instrument figures; the arithmetic is the same multiplication on every account.
With both halves in, the account-model question stops being theoretical. What you are holding is the cost of the volume you really traded, priced under the model you really used, and that is the only version of the comparison that answers for your trading rather than for an average one.
Frequently asked questions
What does the commission look like on a Raw+ report?
Why does a 0.01-lot deal show $4.00 per side?
Does a Standard report have a commission column at all?
How do I total what the commission cost me over a period?
Is the commission charged once or twice per trade?
What does the commission total not tell me?
Should beginners read a Raw+ report differently?
What traders report
These reviews span close to a decade, and what changes across them is the trader, not the broker. The earliest voices praise plain things — spreads, execution, withdrawals, a dealing desk that answered. The later ones are choosing a cost model deliberately: one started on the Standard account, liked its spreads well enough, and moved to Raw+ once he preferred paying a commission for near-zero spreads; another chose his platform first and found the pricing followed. The single complaint has nothing to do with cost — an experienced client notes that nobody follows up with him as an account manager.
I think they are the best in the market. Many instruments, good spreads, no commission, no daily fees, support is good; this is as per my experience. however, there is no account manager to follow up with you.
Good thing they have cTrader because I got used to it already ., can't even look at MT4 after it, props fxpro for offering my fav platform. The spreads are considerably lower here.
I have done a lot of research and tried a lot of different brokers before I joined fxpro. They have very tight and competitive spreads. And I like that fxpro provide a lot of deposit/withdrawal options. Services are very good and professional.
I do prefer a raw account’ why! See spreads. Although when I started I liked the spreads in the standard account too but over time liked the idea of commission and near to zero spreads better.
Gotta say this place is pretty serious, they don't play around... Trading gold jere and the spreads are super tight on it, enjoiying my scalping🤏
I'm with them since last October, and so far all is good - spreads, execution, withdrawals. Also I'd like to note FxPro's Support and Dealing, they are really helpful